Knowledge

Calico Acts

Source 📝

162: 34: 393:"An Act to Preserve and Encourage the Woollen and Silk Manufactures of this Kingdom, and for more Effectual Employing the Poor, by Prohibiting the Use and Wear of all Printed, Painted, Stained or Dyed Callicoes in Apparel, Household Stuff, Furniture, or otherwise, after the twenty fifth Day of December one thousand seven hundred and twenty two" 340:, which slowly expanded till by the beginning of the 1770s seven thousand bales of cotton were imported annually, and pressure was put on Parliament, by the new mill owners, to remove the prohibition on the production and sale of pure cotton cloth, as they wished to compete with the EIC for the British cotton market. 343:
The acts were repealed in 1774, triggering a wave of investment in mill based cotton spinning and production, doubling the demand for raw cotton within a couple of years, and doubling it again every decade, till the 1840s. According to the Indian historian Prasannan Parthasarathi, mechanization and
372:
that from Michaelmas 1701, all wrought silks, Bengals and stuffs, mixed with silk or herba, of the manufacture of Persia, China or East India; and also all printed calicoes, and all painted, dyed or stained there, shall be locked up in warehouses appointed by the commissioners of the customs, till
291:
The impacted weavers, spinners, dyers, shepherds and farmers objected, with Parliament petitioned, the EIC offices stormed by a mob, the fashion conscious assaulted for wearing imported cloth, making the calico question one of the major issues of national politics between the 1680s and the 1730s.
287:
cloth after the restoration of the monarchy in the 1660s. Initially imported as a novelty side line, from its spice trading posts in Asia, the cheap colourful cloth proved popular and overtook the EIC's spice trade by value in the late 17th century. The EIC embraced the demand, particularly for
179:
An Act to preserve and encourage the woollen and silk manufacturers of this kingdom, and for more effectual employing the poor, by prohibiting the use and wear of all printed, painted, stained or dyed callicoes in apparel, household stuff, furniture, or otherwise, after the twenty fifth day of
335:
for the domestic market, though more importantly triggering the development of a series of mechanised spinning and weaving technologies, to process the material. This mechanised production was concentrated in new
373:
re-exported; so none of the said goods should be worn or used, in either apparel or furniture, in England, on forfeiture thereof, and also of two hundred pound penalty on th persons having or selling any of them
331:
and raw cotton). The exemption of raw cotton from the prohibition initially saw 2,000 bales of raw cotton imported annually, to become the basis of a new indigenous industry, initially producing
642: 348:
allowed the British cotton producers "to out-produce not just the quantity, but the quality of Indian textiles", while the textile work in England was paid with a higher
312:. c. 10), blocking the importation of cotton cloth. As there was no punishment for continuing to sell cotton cloth, smuggling of the popular material became commonplace. 364:
1690 – The Impost of 1690 - upon East India Goods, wrought silk, and other foreign commodities, in all 55 in number - 20% tariff on import of East Indian goods
288:
calico, by expanding its factories in Asia and producing and importing cloth in bulk, creating competition for domestic woollen and linen textile producers.
264: 528:
Eacott, Jonathan P (2012). "Making an Imperial Compromise: The Calico Acts, the Atlantic Colonies, and the Structure of the British Empire".
367:
1700 (11 Will. 3)- An act for the more effectual employing the poor, by encouraging the Manufacturers of this Kingdom. - banned most imports
503: 427: 597: 617: 300:. Seeing the East India Company and their textile importation as a threat to domestic textile businesses, Parliament passed the 185: 56: 612: 292:
Parliament began to see a decline in domestic textile sales, and an increase in imported textiles from places like
632: 443:"Cotton textiles and the great divergence: Lancashare, India and shifting of competitive advantage, 1600-1850" 622: 124: 327:. c. 7). This time they prohibiting the sale of most cottons, imported and domestic (exempting only thread 166: 428:"The Early British Industrial Revolution and Infant Industry Protectionism: The Case of Cotton Textiles" 315:
So, dissatisfied with the outcome of the first act, in 1721 Parliament passed a stricter addition, the
276: 51:
An Act for the more effectuall imploying the Poor by incourageing the Manufactures of this Kingdom.
138: 637: 627: 647: 565:
An Historical and Chronological Deduction of the Origin of Commerce, from the Earliest Accounts
345: 248: 549: 259:), which dominated world cotton textile markets at the time. The acts were a precursor to the 260: 174: 46: 38: 8: 252: 545: 495: 602: 499: 442: 213: 96: 607: 541: 537: 487: 280: 180:
December one thousand seven hundred and twenty two (except as therein is excepted).
592: 324: 190: 491: 586: 203: 86: 399:
1730s - modified, with an exemption to the sale of British printed fabrics
471: 337: 576:
Woodruff Smith, Consumption and the Making of Respectability, 1600–1800
309: 61: 476:"Skill, craft and histories of industrialization of Europe and Asia" 475: 380:
1700 - 15% duty on Muslins, a duty on East India Goods, laid on in.
236: 332: 328: 263:, when Britain eventually surpassed India as the world's leading 240: 349: 284: 256: 244: 119: 389:
1721 - Calico Act - banned the sale of most cotton textiles.
297: 293: 383:
1700 - export duty on English woolen produce abolished.
643:
History of the textile industry in the United Kingdom
584: 452:. Department of Economics, University of Warwick 361:1685 – 10% tariff on import of East Indian goods 243:, followed by the restriction of sale of most 235:(1700, 1721) banned the import of most cotton 480:Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 470: 450:International Institute of Social History 585: 567:. Logographic Press. pp. 646–647. 562: 527: 509:from the original on 23 September 2017 304:Encouragement of Manufactures Act 1698 22:Encouragement of Manufactures Act 1698 139:Text of statute as originally enacted 422: 420: 418: 416: 319:Woollen, etc., Manufactures Act 1720 150:Woollen, etc., Manufactures Act 1720 13: 517:– via University of Warwick. 14: 659: 598:Acts of the Parliament of England 440: 413: 386:1707 - 50% tariff on Indian goods 618:Industrial Revolution in England 160: 32: 486:. Royal Historical Society: 4. 556: 550:10.5309/willmaryquar.69.4.0731 542:10.5309/willmaryquar.69.4.0731 530:The William and Mary Quarterly 521: 464: 434: 1: 406: 125:Statute Law Revision Act 1867 279:introduced Britain to cheap 7: 247:textiles. It was a form of 167:Parliament of Great Britain 10: 664: 613:British East India Company 277:English East India Company 270: 146:United Kingdom legislation 71:11 & 12 Will. 3. c. 10 18:United Kingdom legislation 492:10.1017/S0080440114000061 352:than that paid in India. 251:, largely in response to 222: 212: 202: 197: 184: 173: 159: 154: 137: 130: 118: 113: 105: 95: 85: 80: 55: 45: 31: 26: 355: 633:1720s in Great Britain 249:economic protectionism 267:in the 19th century. 261:Industrial Revolution 39:Parliament of England 623:1700s in British law 441:Gupta, Bishnupriya. 265:textile manufacturer 580:English legislation 474:(24 October 2014). 151: 23: 563:Walter, J (1787). 149: 21: 229: 228: 155:Act of Parliament 144: 143: 114:Other legislation 101:29 September 1701 27:Act of Parliament 655: 569: 568: 560: 554: 553: 525: 519: 518: 516: 514: 508: 468: 462: 461: 459: 457: 447: 438: 432: 431: 424: 321: 320: 306: 305: 224:Status: Repealed 218:25 December 1722 164: 163: 152: 148: 132:Status: Repealed 72: 36: 35: 24: 20: 663: 662: 658: 657: 656: 654: 653: 652: 583: 582: 581: 573: 572: 561: 557: 526: 522: 512: 510: 506: 469: 465: 455: 453: 445: 439: 435: 430:. 22 June 2010. 426: 425: 414: 409: 402:1774 - repealed 358: 325:7 Geo. 1. St. 1 318: 317: 303: 302: 273: 225: 191:7 Geo. 1. St. 1 169: 161: 147: 133: 76: 70: 65: 41: 33: 19: 12: 11: 5: 661: 651: 650: 645: 640: 638:1720s in India 635: 630: 628:1700s in India 625: 620: 615: 610: 605: 600: 595: 579: 578: 577: 571: 570: 555: 536:(4): 731–762. 520: 463: 433: 411: 410: 408: 405: 404: 403: 400: 397: 396: 395: 387: 384: 381: 378: 377: 376: 365: 362: 357: 354: 346:factory system 272: 269: 255:(particularly 227: 226: 223: 220: 219: 216: 210: 209: 206: 200: 199: 195: 194: 188: 182: 181: 177: 171: 170: 165: 157: 156: 145: 142: 141: 135: 134: 131: 128: 127: 122: 116: 115: 111: 110: 107: 103: 102: 99: 93: 92: 89: 83: 82: 78: 77: 75: 74: 66: 59: 53: 52: 49: 43: 42: 37: 29: 28: 17: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 660: 649: 648:Protectionism 646: 644: 641: 639: 636: 634: 631: 629: 626: 624: 621: 619: 616: 614: 611: 609: 606: 604: 601: 599: 596: 594: 591: 590: 588: 575: 574: 566: 559: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 531: 524: 505: 501: 497: 493: 489: 485: 481: 477: 473: 467: 451: 444: 437: 429: 423: 421: 419: 417: 412: 401: 398: 394: 391: 390: 388: 385: 382: 379: 374: 369: 368: 366: 363: 360: 359: 353: 351: 347: 341: 339: 334: 330: 326: 322: 313: 311: 307: 299: 295: 289: 286: 282: 278: 268: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 221: 217: 215: 211: 208:23 March 1721 207: 205: 201: 196: 192: 189: 187: 183: 178: 176: 172: 168: 158: 153: 140: 136: 129: 126: 123: 121: 117: 112: 108: 104: 100: 98: 94: 91:11 April 1700 90: 88: 84: 79: 68: 67: 63: 60: 58: 54: 50: 48: 44: 40: 30: 25: 16: 564: 558: 533: 529: 523: 511:. Retrieved 483: 479: 466: 454:. Retrieved 449: 436: 392: 371: 342: 338:cotton mills 316: 314: 301: 290: 274: 232: 230: 214:Commencement 204:Royal assent 109:15 July 1867 97:Commencement 87:Royal assent 15: 472:Maxine Berg 233:Calico Acts 120:Repealed by 69:(Ruffhead: 587:Categories 456:5 December 407:References 310:11 Will. 3 175:Long title 62:11 Will. 3 47:Long title 500:154017526 603:Spinning 504:Archived 237:textiles 186:Citation 106:Repealed 57:Citation 608:Weaving 333:Fustian 329:Fustian 271:Context 241:England 64:. c. 10 593:Cotton 548:  513:28 May 498:  350:salary 285:chintz 281:calico 257:Bengal 245:cotton 193:. c. 7 546:JSTOR 507:(PDF) 496:S2CID 446:(PDF) 298:India 294:China 253:India 239:into 198:Dates 81:Dates 515:2021 458:2016 356:Acts 344:the 296:and 283:and 275:The 231:The 538:doi 488:doi 589:: 544:. 534:69 532:. 502:. 494:. 484:24 482:. 478:. 448:. 415:^ 552:. 540:: 490:: 460:. 375:" 370:" 323:( 308:( 73:)

Index

Parliament of England
Long title
Citation
11 Will. 3
Royal assent
Commencement
Repealed by
Statute Law Revision Act 1867
Text of statute as originally enacted
Parliament of Great Britain
Long title
Citation
7 Geo. 1. St. 1
Royal assent
Commencement
textiles
England
cotton
economic protectionism
India
Bengal
Industrial Revolution
textile manufacturer
English East India Company
calico
chintz
China
India
11 Will. 3
7 Geo. 1. St. 1

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.