853:(2010), which argues that "progressive reformers sought to shift the power to shape policy from the legislative branch to the executive bureaucracy" in an attempt to limit the power of special interests, but that this strategy backfired because of "the ability of interest groups to infiltrate the bureaucracy and promote their interests, often in ways diametrically opposed to the reformers' intentions" and "the capacity of Congress to overcome the influence of groups and generate policy change." In order to counter this, Ethridge suggests a "return to the 'constitutional principle' of gridlock, in which special interests must compete in a legislative forum".
722:
582:
830:". As a result, they argue, gridlock is not determined by party control of the government, but rather by an interplay between the existing policy and the spectrum of individual preferences held by congressional representatives. They maintain, in essence, that "the policy preferences of Members of Congress at or near the median are among the crucial determinants of policy outcomes."
727:
723:
724:
726:
900:(the house where the government is formed) to form a government, or when the votes in a lower house of parliament are so close that a government cannot be sure of getting its legislation passed through the house, or when another party (usually referred to as the opposition party) controls a majority of votes in the
728:
730:
729:
848:
was designed to foster gridlock in order to increase "the likelihood that policies will reflect broad, unorganized interests instead of the interests of narrow, organized groups." Ethridge presented an extended version of his analysis in
725:
991:
McGann, Anthony J., and
Michael Latner. "The calculus of consensus democracy: Rethinking patterns of democracy without veto players." Comparative Political Studies 46.7 (2013): 823-850.
806:, have criticized the U.S. Constitution and Senate voting rules for enabling situations of legislative gridlock. Along these lines, David Brady, a professor of
856:
Researchers such as David R. Jones argue that "higher party polarization increase the likelihood of encountering gridlock". When looking at figures of
818:, explain gridlock by pointing to two interrelated factors: first, "the preferences of members of Congress regarding particular policies" and second, "
716:
742:
803:
702:
theory predicts that multiparty governments are likely to be gridlocked, while other literature shows empirical absence of increased gridlock.
1033:
896:, parliamentary deadlocks may arise when an election results in neither or none of the major political parties having the numbers in the
787:
by author Ned
Witting identifies many of the causes of gridlock in the United States and outlines ways to get government working again.
610:
860:
within U.S. politics, "partisan antipathy is deeper and more extensive – than at any point in the last two decades" with 92% of
778:
770:
762:
834:
1133:
734:
1069:"The case for gridlock: democracy, organized power, and the legal foundations of American government [review]"
478:
869:
861:
84:
907:
A recent innovation has been to remove the power of the upper house to block supply, as well as some other bills.
877:
1173:
774:
603:
473:
251:
99:
754:
488:
237:
69:
40:
687:
541:
74:
45:
876:
of the median
Republican voter. This modern polarization paired with a system designed to operate on
668:
596:
201:
851:
The Case for
Gridlock: Democracy, Organized Power, and the Legal Foundations of American Government
316:
206:
915:
911:
246:
857:
815:
483:
425:
371:
1042:
945:
303:
136:
16:
Political situation in which governments cannot pass laws to satisfy the needs of the people
766:
746:
691:
413:
284:
274:
259:
186:
104:
8:
950:
865:
811:
695:
525:
435:
289:
191:
141:
79:
643:
that satisfy the needs of the people. A government is gridlocked when the ratio between
1115:
960:
919:
893:
873:
656:
563:
156:
1107:
807:
664:
558:
232:
94:
89:
50:
23:
1099:
799:
791:
660:
648:
508:
264:
118:
955:
881:
845:
795:
586:
568:
393:
378:
940:
841:
738:
464:
383:
337:
279:
1068:
979:
777:. Gridlock may also occur within the Senate, when no party has a three-fifths
1167:
1111:
1090:
Jones, David R. (March 2001). "Party
Polarization and Legislative Gridlock".
935:
923:
819:
388:
366:
341:
171:
1019:
Revolving
Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush
1004:
Revolving
Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Jimmy Carter to George W. Bush
990:
151:
901:
897:
838:
699:
678:
which results when congestion causes the flow to freeze up completely.
652:
455:
420:
323:
311:
176:
581:
914:
provides a mechanism for breaking a deadlock between the two houses of
823:
644:
545:
535:
530:
269:
131:
1119:
814:, and Craig Volden, a professor of public policy and politics at the
430:
328:
211:
166:
146:
1103:
833:
Marcus
Ethridge, an emeritus professor of political science at the
675:
624:
553:
513:
196:
181:
161:
30:
674:
The word "gridlock" is used here as a metaphor – referring to the
468:
126:
1041:. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute. p. 1. Archived from
518:
460:
358:
980:
Tsebelis, G.: Veto
Players: How Political Institutions Work
827:
640:
837:, argues in a 2011 policy analysis published by the
922:and, if the deadlock is still not resolved, by a
1165:
1138:Pew Research Center for the People and the Press
773:, or by a different party than the party of the
717:United States Presidents and control of Congress
663:and the legislature are controlled by different
639:is a situation when there is difficulty passing
1134:"Political Polarization in the American Public"
749:and checks and balances of the U.S. Government
705:
681:
604:
798:, as well as political commentators such as
1016:
1001:
984:
1157:Section 57 of the Australian Constitution.
884:, leads to seemingly inevitable gridlock.
611:
597:
1021:. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. p. 8.
1006:. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. p. 4.
1031:
761:frequently refers to occasions when the
720:
872:, and 94% of Democrats aligning to the
655:decreases. Gridlock can occur when two
1166:
892:In parliamentary systems based on the
887:
1089:
1066:
1017:Brady, David; Volden, Craig (2006).
1002:Brady, David; Volden, Craig (2006).
13:
14:
1185:
1032:Ethridge, Marcus (Jan 27, 2011).
835:University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee
745:about the gridlock caused by the
479:Biology and political orientation
710:
580:
1151:
1126:
1083:
1060:
1025:
1010:
995:
973:
926:of both houses of parliament.
474:Theories of political behavior
100:Political history of the world
1:
966:
781:-proof majority of 60 seats.
489:Critique of political economy
1092:Political Research Quarterly
769:are controlled by different
70:Outline of political science
7:
929:
706:Majoritarian representation
688:proportional representation
682:Proportional representation
10:
1190:
822:institutions – the Senate
743:Senate Judiciary Committee
714:
75:Index of politics articles
763:House of Representatives
912:Australian Constitution
790:Law professors such as
484:Political organisations
247:International relations
85:Politics by subdivision
1067:Kelly, SQ (Nov 2010).
878:Burkean representation
816:University of Virginia
755:United States politics
750:
667:, or otherwise cannot
1174:Political terminology
1035:The Case for Gridlock
946:Constitutional crisis
826:and the presidential
741:testified before the
733:
696:consensus governments
692:coalition governments
564:Political campaigning
304:Public administration
137:Collective leadership
747:separation of powers
414:Separation of powers
285:Political psychology
260:Comparative politics
238:political scientists
225:Academic disciplines
105:Political philosophy
1048:on 14 February 2015
951:Government shutdown
888:Westminster systems
812:Stanford University
637:political stalemate
587:Politics portal
436:Election commission
407:Government branches
290:Political sociology
142:Confessional system
80:Politics by country
961:Political efficacy
920:double dissolution
894:Westminster system
785:Political Gridlock
751:
735:U.S. Supreme Court
686:In countries with
676:traffic standstill
657:legislative houses
270:Political analysis
202:Semi-parliamentary
882:party-line voting
846:U.S. Constitution
808:political science
731:
690:the formation of
665:political parties
621:
620:
569:Political parties
509:Electoral systems
233:Political science
207:Semi-presidential
119:Political systems
95:Political history
90:Political economy
1181:
1158:
1155:
1149:
1148:
1146:
1145:
1130:
1124:
1123:
1087:
1081:
1080:
1064:
1058:
1057:
1055:
1053:
1047:
1040:
1029:
1023:
1022:
1014:
1008:
1007:
999:
993:
988:
982:
977:
918:, by means of a
800:Matthew Yglesias
792:Sanford Levinson
732:
661:executive branch
613:
606:
599:
585:
584:
375:
320:
275:Political theory
265:Election science
255:
241:
19:
18:
1189:
1188:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1156:
1152:
1143:
1141:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1088:
1084:
1065:
1061:
1051:
1049:
1045:
1038:
1030:
1026:
1015:
1011:
1000:
996:
989:
985:
978:
974:
969:
956:Hung parliament
932:
890:
796:Adrian Vermeule
721:
719:
713:
708:
698:is common. The
684:
647:passed and the
617:
579:
574:
573:
504:
503:
494:
493:
451:
450:
441:
440:
409:
408:
399:
398:
394:Public interest
379:Domestic policy
369:
362:
361:
350:
349:
314:
307:
306:
295:
294:
256:
249:
242:
235:
227:
226:
217:
216:
122:
121:
110:
109:
65:
64:
55:
24:Politics series
17:
12:
11:
5:
1187:
1177:
1176:
1160:
1159:
1150:
1125:
1104:10.2307/449211
1098:(1): 125–141.
1082:
1059:
1024:
1009:
994:
983:
971:
970:
968:
965:
964:
963:
958:
953:
948:
943:
941:Cabinet crisis
938:
931:
928:
889:
886:
880:, not today's
868:of the median
842:Cato Institute
739:Antonin Scalia
712:
709:
707:
704:
683:
680:
619:
618:
616:
615:
608:
601:
593:
590:
589:
576:
575:
572:
571:
566:
561:
556:
551:
550:
549:
533:
528:
523:
522:
521:
511:
505:
501:
500:
499:
496:
495:
492:
491:
486:
481:
476:
471:
458:
452:
449:Related topics
448:
447:
446:
443:
442:
439:
438:
433:
428:
423:
417:
416:
410:
406:
405:
404:
401:
400:
397:
396:
391:
386:
384:Foreign policy
381:
376:
363:
357:
356:
355:
352:
351:
348:
347:
346:
345:
331:
326:
321:
308:
302:
301:
300:
297:
296:
293:
292:
287:
282:
280:Policy studies
277:
272:
267:
262:
257:
245:
243:
231:
228:
224:
223:
222:
219:
218:
215:
214:
209:
204:
199:
194:
189:
184:
179:
174:
169:
164:
159:
154:
149:
144:
139:
134:
129:
123:
117:
116:
115:
112:
111:
108:
107:
102:
97:
92:
87:
82:
77:
72:
66:
63:Primary topics
62:
61:
60:
57:
56:
54:
53:
48:
43:
37:
34:
33:
27:
26:
15:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1186:
1175:
1172:
1171:
1169:
1154:
1139:
1135:
1129:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1086:
1078:
1074:
1070:
1063:
1044:
1037:
1036:
1028:
1020:
1013:
1005:
998:
992:
987:
981:
976:
972:
962:
959:
957:
954:
952:
949:
947:
944:
942:
939:
937:
936:Budget crisis
934:
933:
927:
925:
924:joint sitting
921:
917:
913:
908:
905:
903:
899:
895:
885:
883:
879:
875:
871:
867:
864:being to the
863:
859:
854:
852:
847:
843:
840:
836:
831:
829:
825:
821:
820:supermajority
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
788:
786:
782:
780:
776:
772:
768:
764:
760:
756:
748:
744:
740:
736:
718:
711:United States
703:
701:
697:
693:
689:
679:
677:
672:
670:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
614:
609:
607:
602:
600:
595:
594:
592:
591:
588:
583:
578:
577:
570:
567:
565:
562:
560:
557:
555:
552:
547:
543:
539:
538:
537:
534:
532:
529:
527:
524:
520:
517:
516:
515:
512:
510:
507:
506:
498:
497:
490:
487:
485:
482:
480:
477:
475:
472:
470:
466:
462:
459:
457:
454:
453:
445:
444:
437:
434:
432:
429:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
415:
412:
411:
403:
402:
395:
392:
390:
389:Civil society
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
373:
368:
367:Public policy
365:
364:
360:
354:
353:
343:
339:
335:
334:
332:
330:
327:
325:
322:
318:
313:
310:
309:
305:
299:
298:
291:
288:
286:
283:
281:
278:
276:
273:
271:
268:
266:
263:
261:
258:
253:
248:
244:
239:
234:
230:
229:
221:
220:
213:
210:
208:
205:
203:
200:
198:
195:
193:
190:
188:
187:Parliamentary
185:
183:
180:
178:
175:
173:
172:Hybrid regime
170:
168:
165:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
148:
145:
143:
140:
138:
135:
133:
130:
128:
125:
124:
120:
114:
113:
106:
103:
101:
98:
96:
93:
91:
88:
86:
83:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
67:
59:
58:
52:
49:
47:
44:
42:
39:
38:
36:
35:
32:
29:
28:
25:
21:
20:
1153:
1142:. Retrieved
1140:. 2014-06-12
1137:
1128:
1095:
1091:
1085:
1076:
1072:
1062:
1050:. Retrieved
1043:the original
1034:
1027:
1018:
1012:
1003:
997:
986:
975:
909:
906:
891:
858:polarization
855:
850:
832:
804:Debbie Parks
789:
784:
783:
758:
752:
685:
673:
636:
632:
628:
622:
317:street-level
192:Presidential
152:Dictatorship
22:Part of the
902:upper house
898:lower house
862:Republicans
839:libertarian
700:veto player
653:legislature
456:Sovereignty
421:Legislature
324:Technocracy
312:Bureaucracy
177:Meritocracy
157:Directorial
1144:2020-01-05
1052:30 January
967:References
916:Parliament
824:filibuster
779:filibuster
715:See also:
546:Governance
536:Government
531:Federalism
132:City-state
1112:1065-9129
1079:(3): 593.
844:that the
775:president
659:, or the
526:Unitarism
514:Elections
502:Subseries
431:Judiciary
426:Executive
329:Adhocracy
212:Theocracy
167:Feudalism
147:Democracy
1168:Category
930:See also
870:Democrat
765:and the
759:gridlock
737:Justice
633:deadlock
629:gridlock
625:politics
554:Ideology
372:doctrine
333:Service
197:Republic
182:Monarchy
162:Federacy
51:Category
31:Politics
771:parties
651:of the
559:Culture
469:Country
127:Anarchy
41:Outline
1120:449211
1118:
1110:
1073:Choice
767:Senate
649:agenda
519:voting
461:Polity
359:Policy
338:Public
252:theory
1116:JSTOR
1046:(PDF)
1039:(PDF)
866:right
669:agree
645:bills
542:forms
465:State
342:Civil
46:Index
1108:ISSN
1054:2015
910:The
874:left
828:veto
802:and
794:and
641:laws
1100:doi
810:at
753:In
694:or
635:or
631:or
623:In
1170::
1136:.
1114:.
1106:.
1096:54
1094:.
1077:48
1075:.
1071:.
904:.
757:,
671:.
627:,
544:/
467:/
463:/
340:/
1147:.
1122:.
1102::
1056:.
612:e
605:t
598:v
548:)
540:(
374:)
370:(
344:)
336:(
319:)
315:(
254:)
250:(
240:)
236:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.